| Course Title | Code | Semester | L+U Hour | Credits | ECTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Classical Kalam Texts | TİB642 | 3 + 0 | 3.0 | 7.5 |
| Prerequisites | None |
| Language of Instruction | Turkish |
| Course Level | Graduate |
| Course Type | |
| Mode of delivery | Face to face |
| Course Coordinator | |
| Instructor(s) | |
| Assistants | |
| Goals | It aims to teach the names of the classical Kalam Texts, their authors, the period in which they were written, the method of the works, the content, which school they belong to, and to teach the views of the schools comparatively . |
| Course Content | Classical Kalam Texts, their authors, the period in which they were written, the method, content, which school belongs to and the views of the schools |
| Learning Outcomes |
- Learns the process of the emergence of the first term theology - Learn the first term Kalam scholars, theirs works and opinions - Learns the properties and method of the first term Kalam works - Learn the comparison of classical theology with today's theology |
| Week | Topics | Learning Methods |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Week | Five works of Imam-ı Azâm and their contents | |
| 2. Week | Fıqh-ı Ekber of Shafi and his views about faith | |
| 3. Week | Imam Malik and Ahmed b. Hanbel's approaches to aqaid and theirs views | |
| 4. Week | Tahavi's works and views | |
| 5. Week | Ahmed.b. Hanbel and Salafism, Salafist works and views | |
| 6. Week | Eş'ari's works, opinions and method | |
| 7. Week | Maturidis works, views and method | |
| 8. Week | Midterm | |
| 9. Week | Mu'tazili scholars' works and opinions | |
| 10. Week | The first term important Eshari scholars, their works and views | |
| 11. Week | The first term important Maturidi scholars, their works and views | |
| 12. Week | Muteqaddimun Kalam scholars, their works and features | |
| 13. Week | Mutekaddimun Maturidi kalam scholars, methods and today's kalam | |
| 14. Week | Comparing the first term and today's Kalam works and theirs opinions |
| Ebu Hanife, “İmam Azam’ın Beş Eseri”, Çev. Mustafa Öz, İst. Kalem Yay. İsmail Hakkı İzmirli, “Yeni İlmi Kelâm”, İst. Ankara 1981; Kâdı Abdulcebbâr, “Şerhu Usûli’l-Hamse”, Kahire 1988; Ebû Mansur Maturîdi, “Kitabu’t-Tevhîd Tercümesi”, çev. Bekir Topaloğlu, TDV Yay. 2002 Ank. En-Nesefî, “Tabsiretu’l-Edille fî Usûlid’-Dîn”, Thk. Hüeyin Atay,-Ş.Ali Düzgün, DİB Yay. Ank. 2003; Şehristani, “El Milel ve’n-Nihal”, Kahire ty.; İrfan Abdulhamit, “İtikadi İslam Mezhepleri”, İst. 1983; M.M. Şerif, “İslam Düşüncesi Tarihi”, İst. 1990-91, Sönmez Kutlu, “İmam Maturidi ve Maturidilik”, Ankara 2004; Saim Kılavuz, “Anahatlarıyla İslam Akaidi ve Kelama Giriş”, İstanbul: Ensar Neşriyat, 2014; Şerafettin Gölcük-Süleyman Toprak, “Kelam Tarih,Ekoller, Problemler”, Tekin Yay. 7. Baskı Konya 2012; Abdulkahir Bağdadî, “Usûlu’d-Dîn”, İst. 1928; S.Şerif Cürcânî, “Ta’rifât”, İst. 1265; S.Şerif Cürcânî, “Şerhu’l-Mevâkıf,” Kahire 1325; Süleyman Uludağ, “İslam Düşüncesinin Yapısı” (Selef, Kelam, Tasavvuf, Felsefe), İstanbul 1985; S. En-Neşşar, “İslam'da Felsefi Düşüncenin Doğuşu”, İstanbul 1999; Furat Akdemir, Dinin Kaynağı Sorunu, Araştırma Yasyınları Ankara 2019İ Furat Akdemir, Vahyin Allah Tasavvuru, Araştırma Yayınları Ankara 2019; Furat Akdemir, fetanet Sıfatı Bağlamında Hz. Muhammedin Örnekliği Meselesi, İlahiyat Yayınları Ankara 2018.Recep Ardoğan; Günümüz Kelam Problemleri, Editör; Klm Yayınları, İstanbul 2018 Din felsefesi / Mehmet S. Aydın. -- 2. bs. -- İzmir: Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi, 1990. Cağfer Karadaş; İnanç Konusunda Bilinmesi Gereken 88 Soru, , İstanbul, 2019,Beyan yay. Metin Özdemir, İslam düşüncesinde kötülük problemi / -- İstanbul: Furkan Yayınları, 2001. Numan Abdurrazzak Samarrai; Geçmişte ve Günümüzde Tekfir Meselesi. /; çev. Orhan Aktepe. -- İstanbul: Vahdet Kitap Kulübü, 1990. |
| Program Requirements | Contribution Level | DK1 | DK2 | DK3 | DK4 | Measurement Method |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PY1 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | - |
| PY5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | - |
| PY8 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | - |
| PY9 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | - |
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Course's Level of contribution | None | Very Low | Low | Fair | High | Very High |
| Method of assessment/evaluation | Written exam | Oral Exams | Assignment/Project | Laboratory work | Presentation/Seminar |
| Event | Quantity | Duration (Hour) | Total Workload (Hour) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Midterm 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 |
| Homework 1 | 2 | 45 | 90 |
| Homework 2 | 2 | 47 | 94 |
| Final | 1 | 4 | 4 |
| Total Workload | 191 | ||
| ECTS Credit of the Course | 7.5 | ||
