Course Title | Code | Semester | L+U Hour | Credits | ECTS |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
First Period Islamic Sects | TİB641 | 3 + 0 | 3.0 | 7.5 |
Prerequisites | None |
Language of Instruction | Turkish |
Course Level | Graduate |
Course Type | |
Mode of delivery | Face to face |
Course Coordinator | |
Instructor(s) | |
Assistants | |
Goals | The aim of this course is to teach the reasons of the emergence of Islamic sects, their basic sources and views. |
Course Content | The reasons for the emergence of the first Islamic sects, basic sources, schools, views and defenders |
Learning Outcomes |
- Learns the effect of political events in the emergence of the first period Islamic Islamic Sects - Learn the first period Islamic sects, their views and their basic sources - Learn the basic concepts, works and advocates of the first period Islamic sects - Learns the current position of first period Islamic Sects |
Week | Topics | Learning Methods |
---|---|---|
1. Week | The reasons for the emergence of the first Islamic Islamic Sects | |
2. Week | Basic sources, concepts and followers of the first period Islamic sects | |
3. Week | The methods of first period Islamic sects, basic concepts and their relation with other sciences | |
4. Week | Hariciyye and reasons for emergence | |
5. Week | Harici groups, their views and the separation process | |
6. Week | The appearance of Mürcie, its effect on the emergence of political and social events | |
7. Week | Defenders of the main views of the Murcie and their relations with politics | |
8. Week | Midterm | |
9. Week | The reasons for the emergence of Mu'tezile, its advocates and basic sources | |
10. Week | Five essentials of Mutezile, its religious and political foundations | |
11. Week | Political and social events that prepared the emergence of Shia. | |
12. Week | Shia's differentiation process, basic views and sources | |
13. Week | Shia groups, separation process and differences | |
14. Week | The reflections of the first Islamic sects to today |
Ebu Hanife, “İmam Azam’ın Beş Eseri”, Çev. Mustafa Öz, İst. Kalem Yay. İsmail Hakkı İzmirli, “Yeni İlmi Kelâm”, İst. Ankara 1981; Kâdı Abdulcebbâr, “Şerhu Usûli’l-Hamse”, Kahire 1988; Ebû Mansur Maturîdi, “Kitabu’t-Tevhîd Tercümesi”, çev. Bekir Topaloğlu, TDV Yay. 2002 Ank. En-Nesefî, “Tabsiretu’l-Edille fî Usûlid’-Dîn”, Thk. Hüeyin Atay,-Ş.Ali Düzgün, DİB Yay. Ank. 2003; Şehristani, “El Milel ve’n-Nihal”, Kahire ty.; İrfan Abdulhamit, “İtikadi İslam Mezhepleri”, İst. 1983; M.M. Şerif, “İslam Düşüncesi Tarihi”, İst. 1990-91, Sönmez Kutlu, “İmam Maturidi ve Maturidilik”, Ankara 2004; Saim Kılavuz, “Anahatlarıyla İslam Akaidi ve Kelama Giriş”, İstanbul: Ensar Neşriyat, 2014; Şerafettin Gölcük-Süleyman Toprak, “Kelam Tarih,Ekoller, Problemler”, Tekin Yay. 7. Baskı Konya 2012; Abdulkahir Bağdadî, “Usûlu’d-Dîn”, İst. 1928; S.Şerif Cürcânî, “Ta’rifât”, İst. 1265; S.Şerif Cürcânî, “Şerhu’l-Mevâkıf,” Kahire 1325; Süleyman Uludağ, “İslam Düşüncesinin Yapısı” (Selef, Kelam, Tasavvuf, Felsefe), İstanbul 1985; S. En-Neşşar, “İslam'da Felsefi Düşüncenin Doğuşu”, İstanbul 1999; Furat Akdemir, Dinin Kaynağı Sorunu, Araştırma Yasyınları Ankara 2019İ Furat Akdemir, Vahyin Allah Tasavvuru, Araştırma Yayınları Ankara 2019; Furat Akdemir, fetanet Sıfatı Bağlamında Hz. Muhammedin Örnekliği Meselesi, İlahiyat Yayınları Ankara 2018.Recep Ardoğan; Günümüz Kelam Problemleri, Editör; Klm Yayınları, İstanbul 2018 Din felsefesi / Mehmet S. Aydın. -- 2. bs. -- İzmir: Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi, 1990. Cağfer Karadaş; İnanç Konusunda Bilinmesi Gereken 88 Soru, , İstanbul, 2019,Beyan yay. Metin Özdemir, İslam düşüncesinde kötülük problemi / -- İstanbul: Furkan Yayınları, 2001. Numan Abdurrazzak Samarrai; Geçmişte ve Günümüzde Tekfir Meselesi. /; çev. Orhan Aktepe. -- İstanbul: Vahdet Kitap Kulübü, 1990. |
Program Requirements | Contribution Level | DK1 | DK2 | DK3 | DK4 | Measurement Method |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PY1 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
PY3 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
PY9 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
PY10 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Course's Level of contribution | None | Very Low | Low | Fair | High | Very High |
Method of assessment/evaluation | Written exam | Oral Exams | Assignment/Project | Laboratory work | Presentation/Seminar |
Event | Quantity | Duration (Hour) | Total Workload (Hour) |
---|---|---|---|
Midterm 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 |
Homework 1 | 2 | 45 | 90 |
Homework 2 | 2 | 47 | 94 |
Final | 1 | 4 | 4 |
Total Workload | 191 | ||
ECTS Credit of the Course | 7.5 |