Course Title | Code | Semester | L+U Hour | Credits | ECTS |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Typo-morphological analysis in Architecture: Theory and Principles | MMR 523 | 3 + 0 | 3.0 | 8.0 |
Prerequisites | None |
Language of Instruction | Turkish |
Course Level | Graduate |
Course Type | |
Mode of delivery | Lectures, courseworks and student presentations |
Course Coordinator | |
Instructors |
Duygu GÖKÇE |
Assistants | |
Goals | Kent dokusunun sürdürülebilirliğinin önemli bir ölçütü yapılı çevrenin sadece mimari (tipolojik) veya sadece kentsel (morfolojik) ölçekte deneyimlenmesi değil, bu iki ölçek arasında kurulan bir köprü aracılığıyla da okunabilmesidir. Bu bağlamda bu dersin amacı yapılı çevrenin tipo-morfolojik yöntemle okunabilmesi için gerekli kuram teori ve ilkelerin alt yapısını oluşturarak öğrencilerin kente oda kadar küçük mimari ölçekten başlayarak bina, parsel, blok oluşumları üzerinden kentin bütününü daha geniş bir perspektiften anlamalarını sağlamaktır. |
Course Content | Urban morphology and the notion of type in Architecture, Urban Morphology Approaches, British, French and İtalian Schools of Thoughts etc. |
Learning Outcomes |
- To be able to re-examine the typological, morphological and typomorphological relations from a new perspective: through the historical development of the concept of type in Architecture, - Understanding the interactions between architecture and urban planning disciplines through their spatial analysis methods - Gaining the ability to systematically analyse the transformational design process of the built environment - Identify and critically assess problems arising from geographical and cultural differences in the application of spatial analysis methods - To be able to contribute to the solution of those problems identified according to the context - Determination of spatial scales where space analysis methods are competent - To be able to test the possibility of applying these methods at different scales - To be able to transfer the analyses and evaluations of the students who understand the historical theories and concepts to the current design process and practice |
Week | Topics | Learning Methods |
---|---|---|
1. Week | Introduction to the general structure of the module | |
2. Week | The definitions of Urban Morphology and its aims and objectives; the definitions of type in Architecture and its historical development process. | |
3. Week | Introduction to approaches to Urban Morphology: Theoretical background, spatial analysis methods, research principles and reasons for morphological analysis | |
4. Week | Schools contributing to the field of Urban Morphology | |
5. Week | Urban form components: Typological and morphological elements and problems arising from the identification of these elements in relation to their associated place scale | |
6. Week | Establishment of the balance between architectural scale and urban scale in the analysis of city form: urban form analysis methods of Conzen, Caniggia, and Kropf | |
7. Week | Morphogenetic concept in architecture; Morphogenetic change and morphogenetic thresholds in architecture | |
8. Week | Mid-term examination | |
9. Week | Typo-morphology in Architecture; The aim of typomorphology and its way to look at urban space concept | |
10. Week | The fundamentals of the typo-morphology; form, scale, time | |
11. Week | Systematic analysis of the typo-morphological evolution of cities through the concept of typological process | |
12. Week | Typo-morphological styles: Italian Muratori and Caniggia School | |
13. Week | Typo-morphological styles: English Conzen School and French Versailles School | |
14. Week | The areas we can get benefit from typo-morphological analysis; the examination of the role of typomorphology in the design process. |
Caniggia, G. & Maffei, G.L., 2001. Architectural Composition and Building Typology: Interpreting Basic Building. Translated by Fraser, S.J. Firenze: Alinea Editrice. |
Chen, F. & Thwaites, K., 2013. Chinese Urban design: The Typo morphological Approach. Surrey: Ashgate Publishing Limited. |
Conzen, M.R.G., 1960. Alnwick, Northumberland: A study in town-plan analysis. Institute of British Geographers Publication, 27. |
Kropf, K., 2009. Aspects of urban form. Urban Morphology, 13(2), pp.105-120. |
Kropf, K., 2014. Ambiguity in the definition of built form. Urban Morphology, 18(1), pp.41-57. |
Moudon, A.V. 1994. `Getting to know the built landscape: typomorphology', in Franck, K. and Scheekloth, L. (eds) Ordering space: types in architecture and design Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York |
Moudon, A.V. 1997. `Urban morphology as an emerging interdisciplinary field', Urban Morphology vol. 1 pp. 3-10 |
Oliveira, V., 2016. Urban Morphology: An Introduction to the Study of Physical Form of Cities. Porto: Springer, The Urban Book Series. |
Samuels, I., 1999. A typomorphological approach to design: The plan for St. Gervais. Urban Design International, 4, pp.129-141. |
Samuels, I., 2008. Typomorphology and urban design practice. Urban Morphology, 12(1), pp.58-62. |
Program Requirements | Contribution Level | DK1 | DK2 | DK3 | DK4 | DK5 | DK6 | DK7 | DK8 | Measurement Method |
---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Course's Level of contribution | None | Very Low | Low | Fair | High | Very High |
Method of assessment/evaluation | Written exam | Oral Exams | Assignment/Project | Laboratory work | Presentation/Seminar |
Event | Quantity | Duration (Hour) | Total Workload (Hour) |
---|---|---|---|
Midterm 1 | 1 | 50 | 50 |
Homework 1 | 1 | 50 | 50 |
Homework 2 | 1 | 50 | 50 |
Final | 1 | 12 | 12 |
Classroom Activities | 14 | 3 | 42 |
Total Workload | 204 | ||
ECTS Credit of the Course | 8.0 |