Course Title | Code | Semester | L+U Hour | Credits | ECTS |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
. | PEM033 | 1. Semester | 2 + 0 | 2.0 | 3.0 |
Prerequisites | None |
Language of Instruction | Turkish |
Course Level | Undergraduate |
Course Type | |
Mode of delivery | Turkish |
Course Coordinator |
Prof. Dr. Özgür YERLİ |
Instructor(s) | |
Assistants | |
Goals | Discussion of urban, urban, urban and aesthetic values of landscape, discussing criteria of landscape and aesthetic environment formation in terms of environment, city and development, urban image and urban identity in the historical process, evaluation of contribution of visual elements and plastic arts to urban silhouette, landscape and environment , art, urban design, culture, environment relations with the concept of landscape |
Course Content | Urban and Landscape Aesthetics |
Learning Outcomes |
- • Define the relationship between the concepts of environment, city and aesthetics and reveals differences. - • Explain the interdisciplinary interaction with which the field is related - • Defining the environmental, city, landscape, aesthetic phenomena for urban spaces - • Gains the competence to create an open and green space system (green infrastructure) |
Week | Topics | Learning Methods |
---|---|---|
1. Week | Introduction to the concept of city, the factors create city | |
2. Week | Concept of city image and identity | |
3. Week | Introduction to the concept of eesthetic, the factors create eesthetic | |
4. Week | Examining a combination of environment, city, landscape and eesthetic | |
5. Week | Examining a combination of environment, city, landscape and eesthetic | |
6. Week | Examining a combination of environment, city, landscape and eesthetic | |
7. Week | Midterm exam | |
8. Week | Cities in historical process | |
9. Week | Concept of space and the factors that make space | |
10. Week | Relationship between space/place and landscape | |
11. Week | Relationship among desing, culture, city and landscape | |
12. Week | Relationship among desing, culture, city and landscape | |
13. Week | General evaluation | |
14. Week | General evaluation |
Lynch, Kevin. 2010. Kent İmgesi |
Keleş, Ruşen., Hamamcı, Can. 2002. Çevrebilim, Ankara |
Kılıç, Selim. 2008. Çevre Etiği, Ortaya Çıkışı, Gelişimi ve Sonuçları |
Öztan, Yüksel. 2006. Yaşadığımız Çevre ve Peyzaj Mimarlığı. TİSSET Matbaası. AnkaraErzen, Jale.2006. Çevre Estetiği |
Program Requirements | Contribution Level | DK1 | DK2 | DK3 | DK4 | Measurement Method |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PY1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
PY2 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
PY3 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
PY4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
PY5 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
PY6 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
PY7 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
PY8 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
PY9 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
PY10 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
PY11 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
PY12 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
PY13 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Course's Level of contribution | None | Very Low | Low | Fair | High | Very High |
Method of assessment/evaluation | Written exam | Oral Exams | Assignment/Project | Laboratory work | Presentation/Seminar |