| Course Title | Code | Semester | L+U Hour | Credits | ECTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Operating Systems | BM305 | 5. Semester | 3 + 0 | 3.0 | 5.0 |
| Prerequisites | None |
| Language of Instruction | Turkish |
| Course Level | Undergraduate |
| Course Type | |
| Mode of delivery | Explanation, Q&A, practise |
| Course Coordinator |
Assist. Prof. Dr. Esra ŞATIR |
| Instructor(s) |
Hüseyin BODUR |
| Assistants | |
| Goals | Main purpose of this course is to improve the skills of students to develop applications on the subsystems of operating systems |
| Course Content | Computer architecture, Process management, process synchronization, process commnication, semaphores and monitors, deadlocks, CPU scheduling algorithms, memory management, vitual memory, file systems, I/O systems and disc planning |
| Learning Outcomes |
- Understanding OS, its services and OS types - Explaining OS structure and principle - Defining processes and employing process system calls - CPU scheduling - Threads - Detecting Deadlock - Understanding process synchronization and solving its problems - Understsnding memory management methods - Understanding Hard drive management methods |
| Week | Topics | Learning Methods |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Week | Introduction to operating systems and strategies of operating systems | |
| 2. Week | Architecture of computer systems | |
| 3. Week | Process management | |
| 4. Week | Interprocess synchronization | |
| 5. Week | Critical section problems | |
| 6. Week | Interprocess communications | |
| 7. Week | Semaphores, Monitors and applications | |
| 8. Week | Deadlocks and solutions | |
| 9. Week | CPU scheduling algorithms | |
| 10. Week | Memory management | |
| 11. Week | Paging, segmentation | |
| 12. Week | File systems, access and protection mechanisms | |
| 13. Week | Input/Output systems, disk scheduling | |
| 14. Week | Final Exam |
| Gary J. Nutt, Operating Systems - A Modern Perspective, Pearson/Addison Wesley, 2004. |
| William Stallings, Operating systems: internals and design principles, Prentice Hall,2000. |
| Andrew S. Tanenbaum, Albert S. Woodhull, Operating systems : design and implementation, Prentice Hall, 1997 |
| Program Requirements | Contribution Level | DK1 | DK2 | DK3 | DK4 | DK5 | DK6 | DK7 | DK8 | DK9 | Measurement Method |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PY1 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 40,60 |
| PY2 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 40,60 |
| PY3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 40,60 |
| PY4 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 40,60 |
| PY5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 40,60 |
| PY6 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 40,60 |
| PY7 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 40,60 |
| PY8 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 40,60 |
| PY9 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 40,60 |
| PY10 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 40,60 |
| PY11 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 40,60 |
| PY12 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 40,60 |
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Course's Level of contribution | None | Very Low | Low | Fair | High | Very High |
| Method of assessment/evaluation | Written exam | Oral Exams | Assignment/Project | Laboratory work | Presentation/Seminar |
| Event | Quantity | Duration (Hour) | Total Workload (Hour) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Course Hours | 16 | 3 | 48 |
| Preparation, After Class Study | 16 | 3 | 48 |
| Verbal Expression | 16 | 3 | 48 |
| Visual Presentation | 6 | 3 | 18 |
| Midterm 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Final | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Total Workload | 164 | ||
| ECTS Credit of the Course | 5.0 | ||
